Case Results

            There are three things you should expect from your lawyer (1) Professional Representation (2) Personal Service and (3) Results. Insurance companies and Fortune 100 companies obtain professional representation and first class service by paying $6,000 per hour and more for their legal representation. You should expect the same representation for your attorney. However, the majority of injured parties choose their attorney based on advertisements and slick promises.

            This page is about results. Results based on thirty years of active practice litigation. Many cases are settled with confidentiality provisions that preclude their being listed.

            This is a partial list, but should give you the definitive impression that my practice is based on results.

 

              Smith v Fire Accident Control - 1.1 million dollar judgment following jury trial. Car accident resulting in head injury.


            Newkirk v Shell - Slip and fall at service station. $750,000 verdict following jury trial.


            Parker v Remington Park - $195,000 settlement following jury trial. Broken leg from fall in training exercise.


              Matlock v 84 Lumber Company - $40,000 settlement reached with employer in rce discrimination case.


             Bartodej v Sherrill, McCoy and OPUBCO - $75,000 settlement reached with defendant driver's insurance company in rear-end collision resulting in shoulder joint injury.


            Kerley v Thanh - $66,000 settlement in auto collision resulting in complex fracture.


            Wallis v IPC - $40,000 settlement with employer in age discrimination lawsuit.


            Rogers v Risner - $150,000 verdict following non-jury trial in auto collision resulting in complex fracture.


            Medlin v Johnson - $15,000 jury verdict in auto collision.


            Dunn v A G Haulers, Inc. - $150,000 settlement for truck driver hurt in rear-end collision in Texas.


             

Comments